Research notebookNotebook updated 12 Oct 2026
Current investigation

A record of the search.

Cicada 3301, Liber Primus, and the evidence behind each lead. Seventy-three sessions of source research and bounded cryptanalysis.

73Research sessions
0New verified solutions
594Supporting files
Start here

Seventy-three sessions. One clear research map.

Follow the strongest evidence, see which earlier results were corrected, and separate open mechanisms from tested dead ends.

Explore the research guide →
Latest research · Session 73

The opening section survives source comparison.

The reviewed 729-rune section retains four neighboring repeats, five singleton types and two words spanning page seams. No master correction is established. The rough first pass and its 136 minimum edits remain visible; the guided review supplies no independent confirmation or new plaintext.

Read the source audit and its limits · Inspect the results
Literature · Session 15

Blake, Emerson, Crowley.

Close parallels strengthen the source map. Their sequence does not supply a simple reading order, and the fixed-key probe produced no coherent plaintext.

Read the source map and experiment
Interpretation

A journey that changes the solver?

Recruitment, independent judgment and emergence recur in the messaging. The hero's journey is a useful lens, with limits.

Explore ethos and intent

Recent sessions

All 73 sessions
73
Opening-section image reading and its limits

No master correction established: 729 runes retain four repeats and five singleton types. The rough first pass and master-guided review remain visible, with no independent confirmation or new plaintext.

No new plaintext
72
Do the one-rune groups act like structural markers?

Seven mapped features show no clear concentration; 61 singletons outside red text lack those features and still span 26 symbols. Placement controls pass, with no new plaintext.

No new plaintext
71
Full state alphabets expose a letter frequency gap

The three frozen rules fail the new full-alphabet screen; no small-bank 25–29-type case passes the references. Fifteen controls recover, while smaller and restricted alphabets remain open.

No new plaintext

What the evidence supports

FindingStandingRecord
Known LP2 prime-based solution reproducedVerified in our testsSession 1
Cuneiform-style groups read as 1033 and 3301Supported, with scale caveatSession 9
2012 Agrippa book cipher reproducedExact known resultSession 12
Literary echoes reveal an unsolved-page keyNot establishedSession 15
Early Bitcoin developers created CicadaNot establishedSession 10