{
  "session": 61,
  "question": "Could the inline three-dot groups be explained by preceding A/AE glyphs and punctuation spacing?",
  "scope": "All 17 solved text images in the retained corpus: archive01,03-16,73-74. LP2 controls are pages38,46,56 already selected in Session60.",
  "solved_archive_images": [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,73,74],
  "thresholds": [80,100,120],
  "screen": "Reuse the Session60 small-component filter and grouping. Inspect every solved-image group with three or four isolated black components at any threshold. Retain artifacts, uncertain cases and threshold discrepancies in the ledger.",
  "comparison": [
    "Review source crops for preceding A/AE glyphs. Record physical context separately from any punctuation interpretation.",
    "Compare the nearest preceding glyph boundary and dot geometry in those groups with the three known inline LP2 targets.",
    "If a standard four-dot group after A/AE exists, test whether that glyph alone is sufficient to remove a dot.",
    "For the known targets, check whether the predicted fourth square lies within the preceding glyph rectangle. A compatible white-overpainting model is only a possibility; it is not proof of the original rendering pipeline."
  ],
  "limits": [
    "Fixed-size isolated-component screening can miss merged or differently sized dots.",
    "Manual image review is not independent OCR or a full new transcription.",
    "Any additional comparison chosen after viewing these results must be identified as a follow-up.",
    "No cipher-key search, new plaintext claim or significance test is planned."
  ]
}