{
  "session": 56,
  "status": "fixed before this turn's all-page image review",
  "question": "Does the tree-to-short-heading-to-large-divider layout recur after other terminal illustrations?",
  "scope": "All 58 LP2 pages, using archive images 17.jpg through 74.jpg",
  "candidate_rule": "A non-text illustration or abstract graphic below the page's final runic text line. Exclude side borders, art only above or between text, isolated punctuation, and numeric or cuneiform-style inscriptions. Record exclusions and borderline cases explicitly.",
  "comparison_rule": "For each qualifying page with a successor, inspect the next page from its beginning. A full match requires an enlarged red initial and red heading at the start, a complete block of at most 150 runes including its heading, and a horizontal row of three large black dots immediately after that block and before the following text block.",
  "short_cutoff_runes": 150,
  "anchor": "LP2 page32 tree followed by the 91-rune upper block on page33",
  "anchor_handling": "Display but exclude the already noticed tree transition when counting additional matches.",
  "end_of_book": "A qualifying illustration on the final page is censored, not a failed match.",
  "uncertainty": "Retain borderline terminal graphics as a separate sensitivity group. Do not change the main inclusion rule to obtain a match.",
  "known_answer_comparison": "If a pattern recurs, compare its heading and delimiter roles with retained solved-page images and known readings. Do not infer instruction plaintext from layout alone.",
  "limitations": "Retrospective descriptive comparison. Many images were seen in earlier sessions. This is a fixed current-turn protocol, not a preregistered independent statistical test. The 150-rune cutoff is an exploratory operational definition, not a property established by Cicada.",
  "stop_rule": "Finish the inventory and selected transitions, report matches and failures, and do not launch cipher or keyword searches from a layout resemblance alone."
}